Fix video metadata without unnecessary recompression
Video metadata is often handled differently from photo EXIF. MP4 and MOV files may rely on QuickTime-style fields that need careful validation.
Microsoft Store will be the recommended path when the link is available. The classic installer remains available from the site.
Unsigned .exe noticeThe .exe installer is not signed yet. Windows or the browser may show warnings during download or installation. To avoid those messages, use Microsoft Store once the link is available.
When this guide helps
This guide helps when videos appear on the wrong date after export, backup or migration.
The goal is metadata correction, not re-encoding the video content unless another tool intentionally does that.
What usually goes wrong
The most expensive mistakes happen when an entire batch is changed before the source metadata is understood. In large libraries, one wrong decision multiplies quickly.
- Assuming video dates use the same fields as JPG files.
- Recompressing video just to change metadata.
- Ignoring timezone interpretation in video containers.
- Not testing the destination app.
Recommended safe method
The most reliable path is to work from a sample, keep a backup and record each exception. That protects the archive and makes the result easier to explain later.
- Inspect existing video metadata.
- Compare sidecars or folder context.
- Apply changes to copies first.
- Verify dates in the app where the videos will live.
How MetaVault Studio fits
MetaVault Studio treats video metadata as part of the archive workflow and keeps the focus on local, reportable processing.
The focus is local processing: your photos and videos are not automatically sent to a server. The site and server handle license, purchase and support only when those flows are used.
Checklist before processing everything
- Which video field changed?
- Was the media stream preserved?
- Did the destination app read the date?
- Were failures listed separately?
How this appears in the MetaVault Studio workflow
The app is designed to import a folder, apply or extract metadata, track progress and review results through a report. That turns metadata repair into a verifiable process.
Transparency and limits
Not every lost metadata field can be reconstructed. When there is no reliable source, the best result is to separate the case for review instead of inventing information. Google, Microsoft, Apple, ExifTool and other names mentioned here belong to their respective owners; use is descriptive.
Related guides
Common questions
Can I process the whole library at once?
The safer path is to start with a sample. After dates, reports and exceptions are validated, the same profile can be applied to the full batch.
Does MetaVault visually change my photos?
The metadata workflow is meant to write or extract information, not recompress the visual content. Still, keep a backup and use copy mode when there is risk.
What happens to files without reliable metadata?
They should appear in the report or in review folders. This keeps uncertain files from silently contaminating the final result.